Springfield m1a socom cqb full review upgrade#

Springfield m1a socom cqb full review upgrade#

The PA-10 I have is not the PA-10 I bought there are a lot of upgrade parts in it/on it which I added/replaced myself. I'd rather build my own AR-10 but I bought my PA-10 complete instead, and the savings was substantial over the M1a. I miss it greatly, but not enough to cough up the cost of replacing it. My M1a was the Springfield Loaded, and it was damned accurate but that involved glassbedding it and handloading. So Caveat Emptor, let the buyer beware there be lawyers in the waters, Matey. What will be true is that the loads we commonly apply to the M1a/M14 will not be as compatible for a different barrel length more, less, who's to tell off the cuff? Dispersion with the same ammunition will differ between the two barrel lengths, but prediction will not say which is 'better'. I'd say that the ammunition/barrel issue hold the most pertinent answer to your question. My abilities allowed me to be as accurate with sling and irons as I was with a scoped rifle, but this is not always the case for all. Iron sights can be very accurate, and I had a lot of practice shooting the M1 and M1a in High Power N/M out to 300yd. If that had been your question, I'd be stopping right here.Īccuracy is bound up by factors like structural integrity, sights and sight radius, or optics, and ammunition compatibility with a given barrel. None of us had complaints about the ergonomics, except those that stem from the simple fact that one size never fits all. It was a representation of the simple fact that the human being is ultimately adaptable given need and repetition. It became a semi-attached appendage, a true extension of my body. In 19, I carried an M-14 in training and combat in Vietnam.